C++编译器性能对比[VC/C++编程]

目前市面上,主流的C/C++编译器包含M$的CL、gcc、Intel的icl、PGI的pgcc及Codegear的bcc（本来属于Borland公司）.Windows上利用最多的自然是cl,而在更广漠的平台上,gcc则是C/C++编译器的首选.但要提到本领优化,排名就未必与它们的市场占据率一致了.

本日一时髦起,便做了一个各编译器数值性能的对比.测试的代码是一个求积分的程序,根源于intel编译器的例子程序,改正了一个头文件,以便每个编译器都能编译.

#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <time.h>
#include <math.h>

// Function to be integrated
// Define and prototype it here
// | sin(x) |
#define INTEG_FUNC(x) fabs(sin(x))

// Prototype timing function
double dclock(void);

int main(void)
{
// Loop counters and number of interior points
unsigned int i, j, N;
// Stepsize, independent variable x, and accumulated sum
double step, x_i, sum;
// Timing variables for evaluation
double start, finish, duration, clock_t;
// Start integral from
double interval_begin = 0.0;
// Complete integral at
double interval_end = 2.0 * 3.141592653589793238;

// Start timing for the entire application
start = clock();

printf(" \n");
printf(" Number of | Computed Integral | \n");
printf(" Interior Points | | \n");
for (j=2;j<27;j++)
{
printf("------------------------------------- \n");

// Compute the number of (internal rectangles + 1)
N = 1 << j;

// Compute stepsize for N-1 internal rectangles
step = (interval_end - interval_begin) / N;

// Approx. 1/2 area in first rectangle: f(x0) * [step/2]
sum = INTEG_FUNC(interval_begin) * step / 2.0;

// Apply midpoint rule:
// Given length = f(x), compute the area of the
// rectangle of width step
// Sum areas of internal rectangle: f(xi + step) * step

for (i=1;i<N;i++)
{
x_i = i * step;
sum += INTEG_FUNC(x_i) * step;
}

// Approx. 1/2 area in last rectangle: f(xN) * [step/2]
sum += INTEG_FUNC(interval_end) * step / 2.0;

printf(" %10d | %14e | \n", N, sum);
}
finish = clock();
duration = (finish - start);
printf(" \n");
printf(" Application Clocks = %10e \n", duration);
printf(" \n");

return 0;
}


　　以上是“C++编译器性能对比[VC/C++编程]”的内容，如果你对以上该文章内容感兴趣，你可以看看七道奇为您推荐以下文章：